43,092 matches
-
and programs, knows the rules of the process, hâș a clear political opinion and is an active participant în elections, which he considers useful to society. - Political participation - manifests itself în a general way, with low intensity, takes the form of supporting some candidates, political party affiliation or participation în political actions. A person with high degree of political participation hâș political knowledge, considers politics an important area, feels comfortable engaging în discussions on the subject or actions and thinks he
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
participant în elections, which he considers useful to society. - Political participation - manifests itself în a general way, with low intensity, takes the form of supporting some candidates, political party affiliation or participation în political actions. A person with high degree of political participation hâș political knowledge, considers politics an important area, feels comfortable engaging în discussions on the subject or actions and thinks he can influence political decisions through his involvement. By simplifying our research results, which can be studied în
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
politics an important area, feels comfortable engaging în discussions on the subject or actions and thinks he can influence political decisions through his involvement. By simplifying our research results, which can be studied în more details (including access to databases of measurements taken and all research reports) at the http://www.infopolitic.ro site, we can observe the level of participatory culture în România, through aggregated scores of this culture (measured on a scale of 1-100, where 100 is a maximum
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
more details (including access to databases of measurements taken and all research reports) at the http://www.infopolitic.ro site, we can observe the level of participatory culture în România, through aggregated scores of this culture (measured on a scale of 1-100, where 100 is a maximum / optimum participation). Thus, for each of the four types of participation, the scores are: - Community participation - național score of 35 / 100. More common în the în NE and NW regions of România, with very
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
www.infopolitic.ro site, we can observe the level of participatory culture în România, through aggregated scores of this culture (measured on a scale of 1-100, where 100 is a maximum / optimum participation). Thus, for each of the four types of participation, the scores are: - Community participation - național score of 35 / 100. More common în the în NE and NW regions of România, with very low scores for younger generations and people without education. - Civic participation - național score of 30/100
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
of participatory culture în România, through aggregated scores of this culture (measured on a scale of 1-100, where 100 is a maximum / optimum participation). Thus, for each of the four types of participation, the scores are: - Community participation - național score of 35 / 100. More common în the în NE and NW regions of România, with very low scores for younger generations and people without education. - Civic participation - național score of 30/100! More frequent în the Centre, Bucharest and SE regions
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
four types of participation, the scores are: - Community participation - național score of 35 / 100. More common în the în NE and NW regions of România, with very low scores for younger generations and people without education. - Civic participation - național score of 30/100! More frequent în the Centre, Bucharest and SE regions, less present în the South. Education influences participation, șo does age (younger people are more participative). - Electoral participation - național score of 57/100, the only category where the score
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
and people without education. - Civic participation - național score of 30/100! More frequent în the Centre, Bucharest and SE regions, less present în the South. Education influences participation, șo does age (younger people are more participative). - Electoral participation - național score of 57/100, the only category where the score is higher than average - the highest score of the measurements. Younger generations have lower scores than older ones. - Political participation - național score of 32/100. Higher values în Bucharest and the West
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
younger people are more participative). - Electoral participation - național score of 57/100, the only category where the score is higher than average - the highest score of the measurements. Younger generations have lower scores than older ones. - Political participation - național score of 32/100. Higher values în Bucharest and the West region. Also, younger generations have lower scores. Lack of participation în the Romanian society The facts measured în recent years there hâș been valid throughout the first 25 years of democracy
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
the non-involvement în NGO's actions - be they for protecting the environment, human rights and animal rights - to the non-involvement în political action or protest. One of the reasons for the closure of the Romanian society derives from another conclusion of this study - the tradițional, family-oriented nature of society. The Romanian citizen primarily considers himself/herself responsible for his/her family and shows a high level of trust towards it. At the same time citizens strengthen their place within the walls
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
this study - the tradițional, family-oriented nature of society. The Romanian citizen primarily considers himself/herself responsible for his/her family and shows a high level of trust towards it. At the same time citizens strengthen their place within the walls of their homes and în the safety of blood ties, a total distrust anyone else develops (the figures are incredibly high - above 90% în terms of lack of trust în other people). From compatriots - known or not - to democratic institutions. Of
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
family became the "individual", even în an aggressive manner. Unlike Western societies, where there are four distinct forms of institutions that offer solutions and perspectives for citizens (family, individualism, community, society / state), post-89 România saw only two of these types of institution (family and individual; community and society hâș not developed yet, because of the lack of a participatory culture)5. The move was from a one party system to political pluralism, from a centralized economy to a market economy, from
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
unidirecțional propagandă to open multichannel communication. The consequences of these changes are numerous and will not be developed here, but at the level of participation and interest în association the developments are very slow. Aș noted above, the național scores of community participation, civic participation or political participation are somewhat equal, between 30% and 35%, with one exception, namely the național average of electoral participation - up to 57%. Electoral participation is therefore one of the major changes that the Romanian public
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
level of participation and interest în association the developments are very slow. Aș noted above, the național scores of community participation, civic participation or political participation are somewhat equal, between 30% and 35%, with one exception, namely the național average of electoral participation - up to 57%. Electoral participation is therefore one of the major changes that the Romanian public hâș gone through since 1989. And this is all the more interesting because, once again, the național score for political participation is
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
and positions. Simply puț, the Romanian citizen who is more interested în who reaches an office than what he later does în that position! The citizen takes part în the voting process, but not în politics. And, besides these moments of effective participation, the interaction with social life is done by "simulating participation", achieved through media channels (especially TV for 20 years and the internet during the last 5 years). Moreover, there is limited knowledge of the instituțional mechanisms of democracy
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
a minimum of 37% în the West Region) knows that Parliament is the main legislative institution în România. Regarding the definition and understanding of a democratic system, for a significant majority - 54% at the național level - the cornerstone is freedom of expression, while political pluralism is at 6%, the freedom to choose a representative and to be elected is at 15%, the right to criticize and protest at 9% and șo on. Why is the citizen more interested în voting than
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
of rallying to the vote. The failure of the trade union movement, the apparent isolation of the "intelligentsia" (which hâș not found an active role - neither during communism, nor în the post-communist era6) and of civil society structures, the lack of debate outside elections have both led to a permanent polarization of society and to an increasing simplification of the message puț forth during public debate. It is a known fact that the electoral message must be easy to communicate în
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
public debate. It is a known fact that the electoral message must be easy to communicate în order to be catchy. Therefore, it is mandatory to be șo designed aș to be understood and picked up by a larger number of citizens. It should not be neither comprehensive, nor scientifically exact. An election message should mobilize and stimulate the intention to vote, not solve the problems of anarea of activity or, even worse, of a nation (the government is - or should
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
and picked up by a larger number of citizens. It should not be neither comprehensive, nor scientifically exact. An election message should mobilize and stimulate the intention to vote, not solve the problems of anarea of activity or, even worse, of a nation (the government is - or should be - the one that offers effective solutions for a country's problems, not the campaign!). Normally the campaign occurs every four years and în the meantime society and its actors have enough time
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
for a country's problems, not the campaign!). Normally the campaign occurs every four years and în the meantime society and its actors have enough time and space required to develop concepts and complex theories encompassing the more subtle forms of reality - and then to achieve the consensus required for decisions through which the solutions are implemented. But if the election campaign never stops, then everything that comes from the political class is inevitably lacking depth! We have talks, but no
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
implement these decisions. The public debate on almost any subject în România is biased and superficial; more șo, advocacy groups from classical media or the online environment amplify the aggressiveness of the camps, șo that the citizen spends every moment of his/her life în another chapter of the electoral campaign. It is an endless battle that assumes that the opponent can never be right and that every moment is a good one to defeat him/her along with his/her
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
evaluation and comparison is based on themes related to communication and media agenda, în a very limited extent correlated with the real agenda of the citizens. Another reason for having an important electoral participation, although there is clearly a sense of disappointment and disengagement from the political phenomenon and also from other participative phenomenon of a modern society, could be based on the intense communication that the Romanian society hâș developed în this direction during the last 23-25 years. There hâș
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
developed în this direction during the last 23-25 years. There hâș not been even one electoral moment when one of the main themes of communication for all actors, directly or indirectly involved în the process, did not need the argument of turnout aș a corollary of the existence of a democratic state and aș a testimony to the civic responsibility of the individual. The vote itself, în public communication, acquired: - Judicial traits (Let's make them pay through our vote); - Punitive
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
recall that prizes have been repeatedly awarded to those who have voted, by accepting people on the basis of their stamped voting bulletin at parties, concerts and raffles. Also, but this time outside the law, there have been different types of "prizes" awarded that have created certain electoral practices characterized by vote buying either with money or with certain types of products. În România there hâș been almost an obsession of convincing people who have never voted and generally stay away
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
this time outside the law, there have been different types of "prizes" awarded that have created certain electoral practices characterized by vote buying either with money or with certain types of products. În România there hâș been almost an obsession of convincing people who have never voted and generally stay away from the booths to take part în the process. Many electoral strategies have been based on percentages plucked from non-participants, aș a miraculous solution for overthrowing election predictions. Last but
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]