45,651 matches
-
new political theology: the first was its uniqueness, because there could be one, and only one phoenix; the other was its autopoiesis, meaning that the phoenix would revive from its own ashes, thus providing the most evident form of empowerment of politics known în the modern age. The Renaissance Queen who made the largest use of this symbol - but she was not the only one - was certainly Elizabeth I Tudor, who often got herself portrayed în that form. Șo, it is
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
dies14". Șo, the mystery of the State, or better, the mystic content of the theological-political foundation of the modern State is unveiled. To this idea is connected the pactum ad excludendum that separated the fâțe of absolute sovereigns from that of their subjects, forbidden ab origine to judge the choices and decisions - initially only with regard to justice, but little by little extended to all matters of sovereign governance - of their monarch. Like în the case of Erasmus's asynus portans
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
of the Christ în Jerusalem riding a donkey, to whom the entire community of the believers bowed, its updating în a theological-political key seems to be that of an ass that carries on its back nothing more than a simulacrum of Jesus Christ, a weak reflection of the original. And în the Renaissance symbolism this image is recurrent, starting from the most important and popular collection of emblems of that time, the Emblematica by Andrea Alciato that Erasmus cited explicitly 16
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
that of an ass that carries on its back nothing more than a simulacrum of Jesus Christ, a weak reflection of the original. And în the Renaissance symbolism this image is recurrent, starting from the most important and popular collection of emblems of that time, the Emblematica by Andrea Alciato that Erasmus cited explicitly 16. The double body of Sovereignty Hence, the duplicity character of modern sovereignty derives just from the mystical origin of its foundation and cannot disregard it în
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
în the Renaissance symbolism this image is recurrent, starting from the most important and popular collection of emblems of that time, the Emblematica by Andrea Alciato that Erasmus cited explicitly 16. The double body of Sovereignty Hence, the duplicity character of modern sovereignty derives just from the mystical origin of its foundation and cannot disregard it în any way. That paradoxical aspect that we have observed în the course of this entire reconstruction is already contained în the critical element that
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
from the most important and popular collection of emblems of that time, the Emblematica by Andrea Alciato that Erasmus cited explicitly 16. The double body of Sovereignty Hence, the duplicity character of modern sovereignty derives just from the mystical origin of its foundation and cannot disregard it în any way. That paradoxical aspect that we have observed în the course of this entire reconstruction is already contained în the critical element that forms the genetic matter of the modern State. The
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
but most of all its resistance, deceptively cohesive of the entire național community, could only căușe horror în those who, like Carl Schmitt, hâd identified and feared this character from the start. Identified through a careful and extremely clear analysis of its development, but feared în an apocalyptic perspective such aș the one that Franco Volpi shows to be one of the peculiar traits of his thought after the end of the Second World War. Indeed, Volpi says that to Schmitt
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
be known. Truth is not conquered through the logical-conversational thought, but it can be "grasped" once we reach the necessary level of maturity. It is a sacrilege to talk about it în public. Truth is the secret monopoly, jealously kept, of a limited élite of 'initiated' people, and the introduction to it is the 'initiation', which is not for everyone. You must be called 'elected'. The means to communicate it (to transmit the inexpressible) is the mythical image"17. Whether the
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
not conquered through the logical-conversational thought, but it can be "grasped" once we reach the necessary level of maturity. It is a sacrilege to talk about it în public. Truth is the secret monopoly, jealously kept, of a limited élite of 'initiated' people, and the introduction to it is the 'initiation', which is not for everyone. You must be called 'elected'. The means to communicate it (to transmit the inexpressible) is the mythical image"17. Whether the mythical images are those
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
are the edifying images of the XVI and XVII Century symbolism, whether they are normative or rhetorical, allegoric o lithographic figures, the important thing is to reconstruct the secret threads of the power issue. "According to Schmitt, neither a doctrine of power nor a theory of sovereignty were enough to unravel that secret. It was essential to discover the indirect power techniques and penetrate the arcana imperii 18". În the early '30, Kantorowicz frequented the George Kreis, ăn exclusive club whose
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
14 November of that year, entitled Das Geheime Deutschland [Secret Germany], dedicated to George's poem Șo will der Fug [Șo Wants the Law] that recites "You can exterminate uș, but what blossoms will blossom richer" (George, 1914). The issue of a universal destiny of the German nation is recurrent în a time of extreme frustration for the German național spirit, but în this prolusion Kantorowicz defines once for all the true limits within which this revived cultural and național pride
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
George's poem Șo will der Fug [Șo Wants the Law] that recites "You can exterminate uș, but what blossoms will blossom richer" (George, 1914). The issue of a universal destiny of the German nation is recurrent în a time of extreme frustration for the German național spirit, but în this prolusion Kantorowicz defines once for all the true limits within which this revived cultural and național pride moves without exceptions. To him, the German culture moves within a tradition that
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
cure resists the rising wave of barbarity imposed by the historic achievement of the invasive structures of the național States. The prolusion's high point, beyond the rhetorical nuance aimed at causing a strong and visceral reaction în the students of his course, is în the insistence with which Kantorowicz connects the German culture to a broader, European, almost unhistorical, but surely universal dimension; an insistence that stands alone from the start against any attempt by the rising Nazi order to
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
German culture to a broader, European, almost unhistorical, but surely universal dimension; an insistence that stands alone from the start against any attempt by the rising Nazi order to seize this ancient tradition and bend it to the tragic interests of a racist and totalitarian State. Faithful to his frame of reconstruction of the continuities between the Classical world and the medieval world, Kantorowicz says that "from Christianity arose a sole Europe, from an imperium sacrum arose the community of western
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
universal dimension; an insistence that stands alone from the start against any attempt by the rising Nazi order to seize this ancient tradition and bend it to the tragic interests of a racist and totalitarian State. Faithful to his frame of reconstruction of the continuities between the Classical world and the medieval world, Kantorowicz says that "from Christianity arose a sole Europe, from an imperium sacrum arose the community of western nations. A unique world, a universal world, just like every
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
Christianity arose a sole Europe, from an imperium sacrum arose the community of western nations. A unique world, a universal world, just like every Olympus and mythical kingdom represented it19".; but the secularization connected to the Renaissance rift - the creation of național States- does not prevent this universal tension from giving life to "underground currents that, dragging with them substances from Europe's original spaces, keep on running under the surface of the kingdom, visible from time to time, to erupt
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
running under the surface of the kingdom, visible from time to time, to erupt later and unexpectedly here and there from the Earth's crust and gather în a basin prepared to collect them20". These Carsic basins are the places of those arcana imperii within which the historic development of the secularization process hâș confined sovereignty and the destiny of the Western World. They are also that mysterium by now incomprehensible of that power that keeps the key of that well
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
to collect them20". These Carsic basins are the places of those arcana imperii within which the historic development of the secularization process hâș confined sovereignty and the destiny of the Western World. They are also that mysterium by now incomprehensible of that power that keeps the key of that well where it hâș fallen, "the mân of sin, the son of perdition" [ό άνθρωπος τής ανομίας, ο υιός τής απλείας] (Paul, Thessalonians ÎI, 2,3). Notes 1 See M. Cacciari, Geo-filosofia
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
secularization process hâș confined sovereignty and the destiny of the Western World. They are also that mysterium by now incomprehensible of that power that keeps the key of that well where it hâș fallen, "the mân of sin, the son of perdition" [ό άνθρωπος τής ανομίας, ο υιός τής απλείας] (Paul, Thessalonians ÎI, 2,3). Notes 1 See M. Cacciari, Geo-filosofia dell'Europa, Adelphi, Milano, 1994, pp. 116-118. 2 See M. Cacciari, Dell'inizio, Adelphi, Milano, 1990, pp. 623-624 3 Id.
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
engendered. My research starts from the these issues which I addressed on a political point of view and is grounded on two fundamental parts 1. The analysis of some concepts such aș sovereignty, legitimacy, representativeness, democracy, governance 2. The comparison of these concepts în two different contexts: E.U., U.S.A. My study starts with the analysis of sovereignty because I think this is an essential part which holds hostage the union, represented aș "unidentified political subject", between intergovernmental organization and
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
A. My study starts with the analysis of sovereignty because I think this is an essential part which holds hostage the union, represented aș "unidentified political subject", between intergovernmental organization and federation. Later on my study focuses on the concept of constitution, constituent power, legitimacy of the two constituțional texts, their content and their interior organization. On the one hand, the American check of balance, on the other hand the Council, the only European centre of power. While comparing these concepts
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
aș "unidentified political subject", between intergovernmental organization and federation. Later on my study focuses on the concept of constitution, constituent power, legitimacy of the two constituțional texts, their content and their interior organization. On the one hand, the American check of balance, on the other hand the Council, the only European centre of power. While comparing these concepts I decided to highlight the limits that these fundamental concepts have în the Union: it lacks sovereignty, a people, a constituent power, relations
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
study focuses on the concept of constitution, constituent power, legitimacy of the two constituțional texts, their content and their interior organization. On the one hand, the American check of balance, on the other hand the Council, the only European centre of power. While comparing these concepts I decided to highlight the limits that these fundamental concepts have în the Union: it lacks sovereignty, a people, a constituent power, relations of representation, it is immersed în a social and democratic deficit, it
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
îl fiscal impact, www.leggioggi.it (22 marzo 2013) Montani, Guido, L'Europa, la sovranità nazionale e la costituzionalizzazione delle relazioni internazionali. www.economia.unipv.it Succes sau eșec al modelului multiculturalismului în Uniunea Europeană [Success or Failure for The Model of Multiculturalism în The European Union] Marcela Monica STOICA Abstract: A theme that appears frequently în public debate, în recent years, concerns the future and destiny of a united Europe, from the cultural approach of the European integration, the relationship between
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]
-
Succes sau eșec al modelului multiculturalismului în Uniunea Europeană [Success or Failure for The Model of Multiculturalism în The European Union] Marcela Monica STOICA Abstract: A theme that appears frequently în public debate, în recent years, concerns the future and destiny of a united Europe, from the cultural approach of the European integration, the relationship between național and European level, the relationship between the național cultures în the European space and the possibility of the emergence of a European cultural identity with
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84979_a_85764]