805 matches
-
is why we have placed the history of psychology within paradigms specific of each historical epoch, where later ones involve the earlier ones, in an epistemological order, and in agreement with the general laws of development of each field of scientific investigation. The construction and reconstruction of these paradigms has marked the successful and progressive separation of psychology from related domains of knowledge, such as philosophy, natural and social sciences, or theology. This complex process has taken place against man's
Istoria psihologiei : altar al cunoașterii psihologice by MIHAI -IOSIF MIHAI [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/970_a_2478]
-
phenomena as natural phenomena. The Enlightenment that followed it brought the necessary completion. Scholastics was the cradle in which the possibility of thinking otherwise then deductively, that is inductively, was born. This marked a decisive moment for the foundation of scientific investigation. It was in this age that of scholastics that the truth about objects and phenomena could be doubted conceptually. Doubting any truth turned into a new epistemological and existential mode, different from earlier ones, in which every act of
Istoria psihologiei : altar al cunoașterii psihologice by MIHAI -IOSIF MIHAI [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/970_a_2478]
-
p. 87. 35 Thoma de Aquino, op. cit., p. 62. 36 Idem, p. 63. 37 Vezi Thoma de Aquino, op. cit. 38 Ibidem. 39 Vezi William Lane Craig, The Cosmological Argument, Barnes and Noble, New York, 1997. 40 William Lane Craig, Philosophical and Scientific Pointers to Creatio ex Nihilo, în Timothy Robinson (ed), God, Hacket Publishing Company, Indianapolis, 2002, pp. 69-70. 41 Schema argumentului este preluată după William Lane Craig. 42 Lawrence Pasternack, "The ens realissimum and necessary being in The Critique of Pure
Argumentul ontologic în filosofia analitică. O reevaluare din perspectiva conceptului de existenţă necesară by Vlad Vasile Andreica () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/891_a_2399]
-
acțiunilor umane de la locul de muncă până la nivelul conducerii Întreprinderii. A „inventat” atunci un nou mod de organizare a activităților umane din sfera producției materiale sub denumirea generică de „management”, concretizat prin setul de publicații: Shop management - 1903; Principles of Scientific management 1911; Scientific Management - 1911. Principiile precizate de Taylor pentru managementul științific au constat În: delimitarea funcțiilor de conducere de cele de execuție; dezvoltarea unei adevărate științe a muncii; aplicarea științei muncii și selecția științifică a personalului tehnic să aibă
CREATIVITATE ŞI PROGRES TEHNIC by GEORGE ŞTEFAN COMAN () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/711_a_1012]
-
locul de muncă până la nivelul conducerii Întreprinderii. A „inventat” atunci un nou mod de organizare a activităților umane din sfera producției materiale sub denumirea generică de „management”, concretizat prin setul de publicații: Shop management - 1903; Principles of Scientific management 1911; Scientific Management - 1911. Principiile precizate de Taylor pentru managementul științific au constat În: delimitarea funcțiilor de conducere de cele de execuție; dezvoltarea unei adevărate științe a muncii; aplicarea științei muncii și selecția științifică a personalului tehnic să aibă loc concomitent; Înlocuirea
CREATIVITATE ŞI PROGRES TEHNIC by GEORGE ŞTEFAN COMAN () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/711_a_1012]
-
acțiunilor umane de la locul de muncă până la nivelul conducerii Întreprinderii. A „inventat” atunci un nou mod de organizare a activităților umane din sfera producției materiale sub denumirea generică de „management”, concretizat prin setul de publicații: Shop management - 1903; Principles of Scientific management 1911; Scientific Management - 1911. Principiile precizate de Taylor pentru managementul științific au constat În: delimitarea funcțiilor de conducere de cele de execuție; dezvoltarea unei adevărate științe a muncii; aplicarea științei muncii și selecția științifică a personalului tehnic să aibă
CREATIVITATE ŞI PROGRES TEHNIC by GEORGE ŞTEFAN COMAN () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/711_a_1012]
-
locul de muncă până la nivelul conducerii Întreprinderii. A „inventat” atunci un nou mod de organizare a activităților umane din sfera producției materiale sub denumirea generică de „management”, concretizat prin setul de publicații: Shop management - 1903; Principles of Scientific management 1911; Scientific Management - 1911. Principiile precizate de Taylor pentru managementul științific au constat În: delimitarea funcțiilor de conducere de cele de execuție; dezvoltarea unei adevărate științe a muncii; aplicarea științei muncii și selecția științifică a personalului tehnic să aibă loc concomitent; Înlocuirea
CREATIVITATE ŞI PROGRES TEHNIC by GEORGE ŞTEFAN COMAN () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/711_a_1012]
-
imagination, I considered that the development of the cognitive nature must be re-evaluated through the way image of the world is built. Knowledge relativity regarding the picture of the world introduces contextual elements within the epistemic structure belonging to cultural, scientific and psychosocial contexts, in a "freeze frame" that is both the scientific status quo reflected by an epistemic item (books, idea, mathematical formula, etc.) and the evolution during "history". Within this formula, the knowledge relativity overcomes the limitations of first-level
Anul 1600: cenzura imaginarului științific la începutul modernității by Dan Gabriel Sîmbotin () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84931_a_85716]
-
re-evaluated through the way image of the world is built. Knowledge relativity regarding the picture of the world introduces contextual elements within the epistemic structure belonging to cultural, scientific and psychosocial contexts, in a "freeze frame" that is both the scientific status quo reflected by an epistemic item (books, idea, mathematical formula, etc.) and the evolution during "history". Within this formula, the knowledge relativity overcomes the limitations of first-level specific to perceptual knowledge ("common sense") and includes the most profound scientific
Anul 1600: cenzura imaginarului științific la începutul modernității by Dan Gabriel Sîmbotin () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84931_a_85716]
-
scientific status quo reflected by an epistemic item (books, idea, mathematical formula, etc.) and the evolution during "history". Within this formula, the knowledge relativity overcomes the limitations of first-level specific to perceptual knowledge ("common sense") and includes the most profound scientific structure found inside the whole scientific framework, such as the mathematical abstractions. First, I started from a reassessment of the concept of imagination that has never been seen only in the light of a development on the fantastic images of
Anul 1600: cenzura imaginarului științific la începutul modernității by Dan Gabriel Sîmbotin () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84931_a_85716]
-
epistemic item (books, idea, mathematical formula, etc.) and the evolution during "history". Within this formula, the knowledge relativity overcomes the limitations of first-level specific to perceptual knowledge ("common sense") and includes the most profound scientific structure found inside the whole scientific framework, such as the mathematical abstractions. First, I started from a reassessment of the concept of imagination that has never been seen only in the light of a development on the fantastic images of the world. I took the scientific
Anul 1600: cenzura imaginarului științific la începutul modernității by Dan Gabriel Sîmbotin () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84931_a_85716]
-
scientific framework, such as the mathematical abstractions. First, I started from a reassessment of the concept of imagination that has never been seen only in the light of a development on the fantastic images of the world. I took the scientific risk to assimilate all the image parts of the imaginary definition expanding it to boundaries difficult to be accepted from a perspective still limited by the mechanism of modernity. Defining imagery is not about what is in our imagination (Imaginarium
Anul 1600: cenzura imaginarului științific la începutul modernității by Dan Gabriel Sîmbotin () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84931_a_85716]
-
of the world. This is the idea of imaginary developed and found in the title. Even if it can be seen as an extension of the current thinking in which Amos Funkenstein 1 is also reflected through his Theology and Scientific Imagination by linking science with imagination, the meaning in which we use this term is different. It covers the whole rational world images, through which we attempt to describe the im-mediate2 and especially the nature. Science is one of the
Anul 1600: cenzura imaginarului științific la începutul modernității by Dan Gabriel Sîmbotin () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84931_a_85716]
-
different. It covers the whole rational world images, through which we attempt to describe the im-mediate2 and especially the nature. Science is one of the cultural components of the imagination, becoming the dominant image of the modern period. Besides the scientific imaginary, the idea of the imaginary censorship must also be introduced, bearing connotations within this theoretical context. As a way of presentation during its evolution, the imaginary vary from simple, pure shapes, where the image has a low symbolic meaning
Anul 1600: cenzura imaginarului științific la începutul modernității by Dan Gabriel Sîmbotin () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84931_a_85716]
-
a moment of ending and beginning the cycle occurs at the beginning of the seventeenth century when Renaissance imagery was censored to allow a fresh start. Then the cycle of the modern era begins that will be dominated by the scientific rationality. In this context we can talk about a censorship of the scientific imagination in early modernity focused on the seveneenth century censorship that captures all the aspects of imagination. So we can initially identify a religious censorship represented by
Anul 1600: cenzura imaginarului științific la începutul modernității by Dan Gabriel Sîmbotin () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84931_a_85716]
-
the seventeenth century when Renaissance imagery was censored to allow a fresh start. Then the cycle of the modern era begins that will be dominated by the scientific rationality. In this context we can talk about a censorship of the scientific imagination in early modernity focused on the seveneenth century censorship that captures all the aspects of imagination. So we can initially identify a religious censorship represented by the reform, a methodical censorship imposed by Francis Bacon, René Descartes and moreover
Anul 1600: cenzura imaginarului științific la începutul modernității by Dan Gabriel Sîmbotin () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84931_a_85716]
-
of modernity. The first and most complex form of censorship is the religious one that manifests itself in various forms and as a counter-reaction to medieval thinking and the developments specific to the Catholic Church. This is complemented by the scientific censorship that human knowledge is explored as a whole, where two authors are mainly analyzed, Francis Bacon (idols) and René Descartes (skepticism), followed by methodical censorship analysis. The metaphysical censorship is also important that reorders the universe re-postulating the man
Anul 1600: cenzura imaginarului științific la începutul modernității by Dan Gabriel Sîmbotin () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84931_a_85716]
-
goal of science, was surprised. Another very important element is the shift from a unitary perspective of science to a batch one, a specialized crossing that has been achieved through a new classification of sciences. The methodical reconstruction complements the scientific imagery developed in the early modernity. The development of the utopian imaginary as an undoubted form of imagination creates a practical mechanism of institutional development of the new scientific framework. The chapter concludes with a description of the metaphysical reconstruction
Anul 1600: cenzura imaginarului științific la începutul modernității by Dan Gabriel Sîmbotin () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84931_a_85716]
-
through a new classification of sciences. The methodical reconstruction complements the scientific imagery developed in the early modernity. The development of the utopian imaginary as an undoubted form of imagination creates a practical mechanism of institutional development of the new scientific framework. The chapter concludes with a description of the metaphysical reconstruction and completion of a new universe. Instead of conclusions the end of the book consists in a synthetic description of the modern "loop" of imaginary since the beginning of
Anul 1600: cenzura imaginarului științific la începutul modernității by Dan Gabriel Sîmbotin () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84931_a_85716]
-
descriptions of some historical realities aimed at outlining some ideas, descriptions of specific ideas about history of science, philosophy and culture, combined with text analysis, original ideas or interpretations can be found too. Keywords: Renaissance, Early Modernity, the imaginary censorship, scientific imaginary, Francis Bacon, René Descartes. Résumé Ce livre représente la composante "pratique" d'une nouvelle épistémè basé sur l'évolution des perspectives sur l'imagination. À partir du déni les théories actuelles de l'imagination, je pensais que le développement
Anul 1600: cenzura imaginarului științific la începutul modernității by Dan Gabriel Sîmbotin () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84931_a_85716]
-
celor două perioade au fost preluate din Angela Botez, "Postmodernismul și valorile postepistemice", în Revista de Filosofie, nr. 4 (iulie-august) 1993, p. 361. 23 David Bohm, Plenitudinea lumii și ordinea ei, Editura Humanitas București, 1995. 1 Amos Funkenstein, Theology and Scientific Imagination, Humanitas, Bucharest, 1998. 2 I use the term im-mediate to describe what science normally calls reality. We use this form to distinguish it from the usual form of "immediately" and to close it to the original Medieval Latin meaning
Anul 1600: cenzura imaginarului științific la începutul modernității by Dan Gabriel Sîmbotin () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84931_a_85716]
-
of "Consistency", i.e., Truth, namely, aesthetic production. He thus acknowledges that art hâș the power of reconciling contradictory aspects, în an original manner, and în a unique work. It is în this spirit that American writer assimilates poetical imagination with scientific imagination, în Eureka. The science that Poe cherishes is the science that advances by intuitive jumps. The beauty thus discovered, refers to the whole design of the universe, and, consequently, hâș a clear metaphysical dimension, în which every atom awakens
Gândul din gând: Edgar Poe și Ion Barbu by Remus Bejan () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84958_a_85743]
-
which C. Poghirc could not have observed 45 years ago that I intend to deal with în this exegetic material. It is about Hasdeu's proposal regarding the institution of a linguistic science, namely noematology, a proposal which anticipates another scientific project, a more recent one, skeology, which belongs to Eugenio Coseriu, another Romanian genius. Aș it usually happens în this kind of research (and mainly because Coseriu's theory is only partially known în România), we should proceed în a
Studii de ştiinţa limbii by Bogdan Petriceicu Hasdeu () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/896_a_2404]
-
be found these days) that positivists hâd made was that of identifying the objects of culture with those of nature, by applying specific methods of natural sciences to cultural sciences. However, în a given situation, approaches can no longer be scientific, since the condițio sine qua non of scientific activity is "objectivity" itself, that is making it adequate to the corresponding object. Having also referred to I. Kant's distinction between "necessity" and "freedom" (also previously intuited by G. Vico), Eugenio
Studii de ştiinţa limbii by Bogdan Petriceicu Hasdeu () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/896_a_2404]
-
was that of identifying the objects of culture with those of nature, by applying specific methods of natural sciences to cultural sciences. However, în a given situation, approaches can no longer be scientific, since the condițio sine qua non of scientific activity is "objectivity" itself, that is making it adequate to the corresponding object. Having also referred to I. Kant's distinction between "necessity" and "freedom" (also previously intuited by G. Vico), Eugenio Coseriu clearly states that: "Los objetos naturales pertenecen
Studii de ştiinţa limbii by Bogdan Petriceicu Hasdeu () [Corola-publishinghouse/Science/896_a_2404]