163,950 matches
-
Republică Moldova. În caz contrar, ar fi grav sfidata suveranitatea națională și voința poporului. Legislația electorală deja prevede interdicții și sancțiuni dure în cazul finanțării din străinătate a concurenților electorali. Recent, s-a introdus prohibiția că în imaginile din publicitatea electorală să nu apară personalități străine. De remarcat că și în campania de alegere a bașcanului Găgăuziei, din 23 martie 2015, au fost implicați actori politici din Federația Rusă. Pe unul din bilboarduri, candidatul independent Irina Vlah apare în imagine alături de
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
demisia. Prin urmare, trebuie să constatăm că rezultatele alegerilor parlamentare din noiembrie 2014 au generat mai multe vulnerbilități în sistemul politic al Republicii Moldova. Tendința de modernizare politică și continuare a parcursului european, anunțată de partidele din coaliția proeuropeană în campania electorală, a fost compromisă atât de fenomenul corupției care a penetrat adânc în sânul elitei politice naționale, dar și de acutizarea concurenței între cei doi cei mai influenți lideri politici din țară - Vlad Filat și Vlad Plahotniuc. La etapa actuala, în
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
dar și de experiență anilor trecuți, marcați de conflicte și de absență dialogului chiar și în probleme fundamentale pentru România. Avem o nouă Strategie Națională de Apărare, care a fost adoptată în termen de 6 luni, avem o nouă legislație electorală și o lege a votului prin corespondență. Sunt angajamente pe care le-am asumat la începutul acestui an și care s-au realizat. Aș menționa totodată consolidarea statului de drept și faptul că în această perioadă lupta împotriva corupției a
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
mai sunt multe de făcut. Important este însă că lucrurile s-au mișcat și că procesul de reformare profundă a modului în care arăta politică românească intra pe o traiectorie ireversibilă. Interviu realizat de Sabin DRĂGULIN & Luminița KOHALMI VARIA The Electoral Republic of România. Arguments about the need for an analysis regarding the Romanian participatory culture Bogdan TEODORESCU Dan SULTĂNESCU Abstract. For România, the 90's have been the decade of transition to a democratic political system (with everything it implies
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
view, they have rarely used - and without impact. Political România hâș been active only în election years, which is why the profile of stimulated civic participation is extremely fragile. Keywords: public communication, civic culture, civic participation, Romanian elections, Romanian history, electoral campaign. Introduction În search of an explanatory paradigm about the construction of the democratic Romanian society after 1989, we want to offer an alternative explanation, different from those who usually puț forth arguments related to political or economic power. The
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
to the "electoralism" of the Romanian society. Before anything else, România is a country dominated by an obsession with public image - it is important, because it is a decisive element în the only confrontation that can generate strong public participation - electoral participation. The post `89 history of România is more than a history of political and economic relationships - it is a history of the relationships generated by electoral moments. This perspective is not only a result of the explanatory view that
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
a decisive element în the only confrontation that can generate strong public participation - electoral participation. The post `89 history of România is more than a history of political and economic relationships - it is a history of the relationships generated by electoral moments. This perspective is not only a result of the explanatory view that the authors go by (which is worth more than a limited scientific approach, such aș the one included în this article), but comes from the results of
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
at one point, focused solely on media perception. Citizen participation în political life is often reduced only to the consumption of media, the crystallization of a point of view based on a received message and then converting it în an electoral option expressed at first în the polls and then at the voting booth. But there are several ways to participate which must exist în order to support a genuine civic culture, one that contributes to the strengthening of democratic values
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
etc.). A person with a high degree of community participation trusts people, is prone to involvement în the community, is caring and helps relatives or neighbors, often discussed local projects with friends, is willing to get involved în local activities. - Electoral participation - it is easy to understand (it refers not only to turnout, but also to participation în elections by running for office or involvement în the campaign). A person with a high degree of electoral participation hâș confidence în the
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
get involved în local activities. - Electoral participation - it is easy to understand (it refers not only to turnout, but also to participation în elections by running for office or involvement în the campaign). A person with a high degree of electoral participation hâș confidence în the electoral process, is knowledgeable about candidates and programs, knows the rules of the process, hâș a clear political opinion and is an active participant în elections, which he considers useful to society. - Political participation - manifests
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
participation - it is easy to understand (it refers not only to turnout, but also to participation în elections by running for office or involvement în the campaign). A person with a high degree of electoral participation hâș confidence în the electoral process, is knowledgeable about candidates and programs, knows the rules of the process, hâș a clear political opinion and is an active participant în elections, which he considers useful to society. - Political participation - manifests itself în a general way, with
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
scores for younger generations and people without education. - Civic participation - național score of 30/100! More frequent în the Centre, Bucharest and SE regions, less present în the South. Education influences participation, șo does age (younger people are more participative). - Electoral participation - național score of 57/100, the only category where the score is higher than average - the highest score of the measurements. Younger generations have lower scores than older ones. - Political participation - național score of 32/100. Higher values în
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
of participation and interest în association the developments are very slow. Aș noted above, the național scores of community participation, civic participation or political participation are somewhat equal, between 30% and 35%, with one exception, namely the național average of electoral participation - up to 57%. Electoral participation is therefore one of the major changes that the Romanian public hâș gone through since 1989. And this is all the more interesting because, once again, the național score for political participation is only
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
association the developments are very slow. Aș noted above, the național scores of community participation, civic participation or political participation are somewhat equal, between 30% and 35%, with one exception, namely the național average of electoral participation - up to 57%. Electoral participation is therefore one of the major changes that the Romanian public hâș gone through since 1989. And this is all the more interesting because, once again, the național score for political participation is only 32%. We can consider that
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
changes that the Romanian public hâș gone through since 1989. And this is all the more interesting because, once again, the național score for political participation is only 32%. We can consider that the citizen is more interested în the electoral system than în the political system, is more informed about candidates în elections than political actors within specific organizations and better knows electoral bids than ideological offers and positions. Simply puț, the Romanian citizen who is more interested în who
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
for political participation is only 32%. We can consider that the citizen is more interested în the electoral system than în the political system, is more informed about candidates în elections than political actors within specific organizations and better knows electoral bids than ideological offers and positions. Simply puț, the Romanian citizen who is more interested în who reaches an office than what he later does în that position! The citizen takes part în the voting process, but not în politics
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
vote hâș carried a multitude of meanings, șo no matter how disappointed the Romanian population is în the democratic process, it does not abandon this ritual. But this is not by chance ... obsessed by image and consumed by a constant electoral struggle, parties and their leaders have aggressively instilled the need of rallying to the vote. The failure of the trade union movement, the apparent isolation of the "intelligentsia" (which hâș not found an active role - neither during communism, nor în
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
and of civil society structures, the lack of debate outside elections have both led to a permanent polarization of society and to an increasing simplification of the message puț forth during public debate. It is a known fact that the electoral message must be easy to communicate în order to be catchy. Therefore, it is mandatory to be șo designed aș to be understood and picked up by a larger number of citizens. It should not be neither comprehensive, nor scientifically
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
the election campaign never stops, then everything that comes from the political class is inevitably lacking depth! We have talks, but no action - precisely because public discourse is better suited to a society where the only thing that works is electoral participation. Action should work în a society with functioning mechanisms that generate solutions and the consensus needed to implement these decisions. The public debate on almost any subject în România is biased and superficial; more șo, advocacy groups from classical
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
subject în România is biased and superficial; more șo, advocacy groups from classical media or the online environment amplify the aggressiveness of the camps, șo that the citizen spends every moment of his/her life în another chapter of the electoral campaign. It is an endless battle that assumes that the opponent can never be right and that every moment is a good one to defeat him/her along with his/her supporters. This perpetual battle generates social tension that inevitably
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
they have specifically done during their mandate - the evaluation and comparison is based on themes related to communication and media agenda, în a very limited extent correlated with the real agenda of the citizens. Another reason for having an important electoral participation, although there is clearly a sense of disappointment and disengagement from the political phenomenon and also from other participative phenomenon of a modern society, could be based on the intense communication that the Romanian society hâș developed în this
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
the political phenomenon and also from other participative phenomenon of a modern society, could be based on the intense communication that the Romanian society hâș developed în this direction during the last 23-25 years. There hâș not been even one electoral moment when one of the main themes of communication for all actors, directly or indirectly involved în the process, did not need the argument of turnout aș a corollary of the existence of a democratic state and aș a testimony
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
to those who have voted, by accepting people on the basis of their stamped voting bulletin at parties, concerts and raffles. Also, but this time outside the law, there have been different types of "prizes" awarded that have created certain electoral practices characterized by vote buying either with money or with certain types of products. În România there hâș been almost an obsession of convincing people who have never voted and generally stay away from the booths to take part în
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
vote buying either with money or with certain types of products. În România there hâș been almost an obsession of convincing people who have never voted and generally stay away from the booths to take part în the process. Many electoral strategies have been based on percentages plucked from non-participants, aș a miraculous solution for overthrowing election predictions. Last but not least, the party propagandă hâș tried to downplay the importance of unfavorable polls, always referring the mass of citizens who
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]
-
to explain the functioning of the institutions that are populated through votes or to clarify the real relationship between citizenship rights and these institutions. An explanation of this distinction hâș to do with the source of these types of participation - electoral participation is encouraged (and required) by political parties, while the other three types we defined should be desired by civil society! Or, here we see the major failure of civil society. Parties are interested în electoral participation to legitimize their
Polis () [Corola-journal/Science/84976_a_85761]