KorAP: Find »[drukola/base=linguistic & drukola/pos=adjective]« with Poliqarp

<1 ...6 7 8 ...19 >

472 matches

Corola-publishinghouse/Science/85013_a_85799

București. Nikolaeva, Irina, 1999, "Object Agreement, Grammatical Relations, and Information Structure", în Studies in Language, 23, 2, p. 331-376. Nikolaeva, Irina, 2003, "Modifier-Head Person Concord", în G. Booij, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, S. Sgroi și S. Scalise (eds.), Morphology and Linguistic Typology, On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4), Catania, 21-23 September 2003, University of Bologna, 2005 (http://ling.uni-konstanz.de/pages/home/nikolaeva/papers/modifier-head-concord.pdf). Noailly, Michèle, 2000, "Apposition, coordination, reformulation dans les suites des deux GN

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/85013_a_85799]
internet. Postal, P., 1969, "On the So-Called 'Pronouns' in English", în D. Reibel, S. Shane (eds), Modern Studies in English, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, p. 201-224. Preminger, Omer, 2009, "Breaking Agreements: Distinguishing Agreement and Clitic Doubling by Their Failures", în Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 40, nr. 4, p. 619-666. Preminger, Omer, 2009, Agreement and Its Failures, curs susținut la școala de vară EGG09, Poznań, Polonia. Pollard, Carl, Ivan A. Sag, 1994, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Popescu-Marin, M.

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/85013_a_85799]
al declinării românești", în Studii și cercetări lingvistice, XXII, nr. 5, p. 459-470. Riemsdijk, H. C. van, 2006, Silent (Semi-)Lexical Heads, paper presented at the University of Bucharest Lecture Series, June 8th. Ritter, Elisabeth, 1993, "Where's Gender?", în Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 795-803. Roberts, Ian, Anna Roussou, 2003, Syntactic Change. A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Rothstein, Susan, 2009, Towards a Grammar of Counting and Measuring, comunicare prezentată la Workshop on Nominal and Verbal Plurality, Paris, November

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/85013_a_85799]
2008, "Phasal Agreement and Reconstruction", în R. Freidin, C. Otero, M. L. Zubizarreta (eds), Foundational Hypotheses, Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press, p. 167-196. Sadler, Louisa, 2006, "Gender resolution in Rumanian", în Miriam Butt, Mary Dalrymple, Tracy Holloway King (eds), Intelligent Linguistic Architectures: Variations on Themes by Ron Kaplan, CSLI Publications. (http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~louisa/newpapers/rumanian-extract.pdf) Sandfeld, Kr., H. Olsen, 1936, 1960, 1962, Syntaxe roumaine, I, Emploi des mots à flexion, II, Les groupes des mots, III, Structure

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/85013_a_85799]
Gramatica numelor proprii în limba română, București, Editura All. Trommer, Jochen, 2001, The Post-Syntactic Morphology of the Albanian Pre-Posed Article: Evidence for Distributed Morphology, ms., internet. Uriagereka, J., 1995, "Aspects of the Syntax of Clitic Placement in Western Romance", în Linguistic Inquiry, nr. 26, 1, p. 79-123. Valois, D., 1991, "The internal syntax of DP and adjectival placement in English and French", în T. Sherer (ed.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Liguistics Society 21.), Amherst, Graduate Linguistics Student Association, 21, p.

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/85013_a_85799]
nr. 37. Zamparelli, Roberto, 2004, "On the thickness of plurals", în Snippets, 8, http://www.ledonline.it/snippets. Zlatić, Larisa, 2002, "The morphosyntax of Slavic Possessives", în Arika Okrent, John Boyle (eds), The Proceedings from the Panels of the Chicago Linguistic Society's Thirty-Sixth Meeting, Volume 36-2, Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society, p. 179-190. Zribi-Hertz, Anne, 2003, "Pour une analyse unitaire de DE partitif", în Francis Corblin, Sylvie Ferrando, Lucien Kupferman (eds), Actes du colloque Indéfinis et prédication, Paris, Presses de la Sorbonne

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/85013_a_85799]
plurals", în Snippets, 8, http://www.ledonline.it/snippets. Zlatić, Larisa, 2002, "The morphosyntax of Slavic Possessives", în Arika Okrent, John Boyle (eds), The Proceedings from the Panels of the Chicago Linguistic Society's Thirty-Sixth Meeting, Volume 36-2, Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society, p. 179-190. Zribi-Hertz, Anne, 2003, "Pour une analyse unitaire de DE partitif", în Francis Corblin, Sylvie Ferrando, Lucien Kupferman (eds), Actes du colloque Indéfinis et prédication, Paris, Presses de la Sorbonne, p. 141-154. Zwart, Jan-Wouter, 2006, "Complementizer agreement and dependency

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/85013_a_85799]
of when the word specifying crucial information is encountered in real time. The grammatical 'process' of, say, a verb agreeing with its subject is thus an illusion. The directional flow of information is essentially a property of language use (or linguistic performance), while the (competence) grammar of agreement is nothing more than a system of constraints requiring certain token identities, and hence inducing compatibility of certain lexically specified information." (1994: 61). 18 Din cauza omonimiei f.sg. = n.pl. la nominativ, ambele glose sunt

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/85013_a_85799]
Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84964_a_85749

of Metaphor, Editura Radman, - N.Y: W de Gruyter, Berlin. STANCA, A., 2007: Alexandra Stanca, Repere istorice ale terminologiei, UVT, Timișoara. STANCU, V. P., 2006: Valeriu Stancu, Paratextul, Editura Universității "Alexandru Ioan Cuza", Iași. STEEN G., 1999: G. Steen, From linguistic to conceptual metaphor in five steps, în R.W. Gibbs jr. G.J. Steen (eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. STENGERS, Isabelle, 1993: Isabelle Stengers, L invention des sciences modernes, La Decouverté, Paris. STENGERS, I., SCHLANGER, J., 1989

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84964_a_85749]
în Limba Română 7-9, Chișinău. Abstract The volume entitled Linguistics and terminology. Hermeneutics of metaphor in specialised language, by Doina Butiurca, holder of a PhD in Philology, draws on two of Eugen Coșeriu's affirmations. Firstly, language is instrumental, no linguistic form is used with an end in itself (language "use means to communicate something that language itself does not identify with"). The second hypothesis is the history of a language: the linguistic act is realised based on a previous model

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84964_a_85749]
Coșeriu's affirmations. Firstly, language is instrumental, no linguistic form is used with an end in itself (language "use means to communicate something that language itself does not identify with"). The second hypothesis is the history of a language: the linguistic act is realised based on a previous model "(...) that serves as model for the coming linguistic acts, thus ensuring the system's diachronic continuity". The volume familiarizes the reader with the study of the informative, denotative, appellative dynamics of language

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84964_a_85749]
itself (language "use means to communicate something that language itself does not identify with"). The second hypothesis is the history of a language: the linguistic act is realised based on a previous model "(...) that serves as model for the coming linguistic acts, thus ensuring the system's diachronic continuity". The volume familiarizes the reader with the study of the informative, denotative, appellative dynamics of language, in general, and specialised languages in particular, with accommodation of linguistics to terminology, through the 7

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84964_a_85749]
languages in particular, with accommodation of linguistics to terminology, through the 7 chapters regarding communication and the functions of of language, terminology, hermeneutics of metaphor in specialised languages, the dynamics of metaphor of Greek-Latin root, preconceptual patterns in medical terminology, linguistic, conceptual and semantic paradigms in pan-Latin languages interdisciplinary terminology studies. The novelty is given by the diachronic and synchronic study of denominational metaphor (the main objective of the research), which allows for distinguishing the features and oppositions between scientific

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84964_a_85749]
layers: the cognitive layer - metaphor is the intuition of a "reality" that it provokes and reflects "on the logical level, in reason"; the conceptual layer - metaphor shows "the irreversible and universal unity of a common ground"; and the level of linguistic science, where scientific metaphor reflects the close relationship between linguistics and descriptive terminology. Specialised metaphor is studied in this volume under the aspect of "Greek-Latin cultural density", a parameter that includes it in the "European and global cultural heritage". (The

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84964_a_85749]
especially due to the fact that it is interdisciplinary (linguistics, medicine, economy, IT, etc.). The volume correctly and adequately pinpoints the basic aspects regarding the historical dimension of the object of study, as well as aspects pertaining (synchronically, in a linguistic, descriptive way) to the hermeneutics of specialised metaphor (motivation, function, patterns of specialised metaphors, transparency, translatability, interdisciplinarity). This volume harmoniously blends the chapters that refer, on one hand, to the formative aspects of studying specialised lexis, and, on the other

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84964_a_85749]
Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84947_a_85732

Andreas H. (ed.), Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1995. Julia, Didier, Dictionnaire de la philosophie, Larousse, Paris, 1964 (trad. rom. Dicționar de filozofie, Univers Enciclopedic, București, 1999). Justeson, J. S., Katz, S. M., Technical terminology: Some linguistic properties and an algorithm for idenfication in text, în "Natural Laguage Engineering", 1, 1995, pp. 9-27. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine, L'Implicite, Armand Colin, Paris, 1986. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine, La Conversation, Seuil, Paris, 1996. Kleiber, Georges, Anaphores et pronoms, Duculot, Paris, 1994. Klinkenberg

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84947_a_85732]
Texts, Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, 1980; Text Production, Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, 1984; Writing Step by Step. A Textbook for College Writers, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 1985; Critical Discourse. A Survey of Contemporary Literary Theorists, Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, 1988; Linguistic Theory. The Discourse of Fundamental Works, Longman, London, 1991; New Foundations for a Science of Text and Discourse, Ablex, Greenwich, Connecticut, 1997. Janet H. BEAVIN (Janet Beavin Bavelas, n. 1940), profesoară de psihologie la Universitatea Victoria, specialistă în psihologie socială

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84947_a_85732]
său. Pe de altă parte, spre deosebire de F. de Saussure, E. Benveniste consideră că semnul lingvistic nu este arbitrar, ci este determinat de sistemul lingvistic căruia îi aparține, idee demostrată pe larg în lucrarea sa din 1939, The Nature of the Linguistic Sign. Alte lucrări: Noms d'agent et noms d'action en indo-européen, Klincksiek, Paris, 1948; Problèmes sémantiques de la réconstruction, în "Word", 10, 1954, New York, pp. 251-264; Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes, Les Editions de Minuit, Paris, 2 vol., 1969, 1970

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84947_a_85732]
universale și generative, asupra raportului dintre competență și performanță, asupra relației structură de adîncime-structură de suprafață au cunoscut aprofundări și emendări, Chomsky însuși revenind și propunînd de-a lungul timpului rafinări complexe (programul minimalist). Lucrări de referință: Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory (1955), Chicago, 1975; Transformational Analysis, teză de doctorat (Ph.D.), University of Pennsylvania, 1955; Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague, 1957; Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, Mouton, The Hague, 1964; Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, The MIT Press, Cambridge

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84947_a_85732]
propunînd de-a lungul timpului rafinări complexe (programul minimalist). Lucrări de referință: Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory (1955), Chicago, 1975; Transformational Analysis, teză de doctorat (Ph.D.), University of Pennsylvania, 1955; Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague, 1957; Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, Mouton, The Hague, 1964; Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1965; Cartesian Linguistics, Harper & Row, New York, 1966; Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar, Mouton, The Hague, 1972; Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, Plenum, New York, 1975

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84947_a_85732]
1957; Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, Mouton, The Hague, 1964; Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1965; Cartesian Linguistics, Harper & Row, New York, 1966; Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar, Mouton, The Hague, 1972; Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, Plenum, New York, 1975; Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht, 1981; Knowledge of Language. Its Nature, Origin, and Use, Praeger Publishers, New York, 1985 (trad. rom. Cunoașterea limbii, Editura Științifică, București, 1996); The Minimalist Program, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1995

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84947_a_85732]
1968, o reorientare a studiului sintaxei spre nivelul semantic. Considerat un reprezentant al lingvisticii cognitive, dezvoltă și aprofundează ideile despre rolul fundamental al semanticii în studii precum: The Case for Case, în Bach, E., Harms, R. T. (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1968, pp.1-88; Frame semantics and the nature of language, în Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech, Volume 280, 1976, pp. 20-32; Lectures

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84947_a_85732]
The Ethnography of Communication, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, 1972. Alte idei au fost expuse în lucrări ca: Discourse Strategies, Cambrigde University Press, Cambridge, 1982, Language an Social Identity, Cambrigde University Press, Cambridge, 1982; (în colab. cu Levinson, Stephen C.) Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996. Valeria GUȚU-ROMALO (n. 1928), autoare de gramatici, profesoară la Universitatea din București. Lucrările sale au valorificat la început achizițiile lingvisticii structurale și, mai tîrziu, ale funcționalismului și ale generativismului, în descrierea limbii române. Coordonatoare

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84947_a_85732]
Autobiography, Doubleday, New York, 1992. Michael Alexander Kirkwood HALLIDAY (n. 1925), profesor britanic, specialist în gramatică, fondator al funcționalismului lingvistic. Lucrări de referință: Explorations in the Functions of Language, Edward Arnold, London, 1973; Learning How to Mean, Edward Arnold, London, 1975; Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse, (ed. Jonathan Webster), Continuum International Publishing, 2002; On Language and Linguistics, (ed. Jonathan Webster), Continuum International Publishing, 2003; On Grammar, (ed. Jonathan Webster), Continuum International Publishing, 2005; The Language of Science, (ed. Jonathan Webster), Continuum

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84947_a_85732]
Negation, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 2010; (coed. cu Kato, Yasuhiko) Negation and Polarity. Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000; (coed. cu Ward, Gregory) The Handbook of Pragmatics, Blackwell, Oxford, 2004; (coed. cu Kecskes, Istvan) Explorations in Pragmatics. Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 2007. Friedrich Wilhelm von HUMBOLDT (1767-1835), filozof, lingvist și om politic german. Ca filozof al limbii, trasează direcții complexe de investigare pe care le vor exploata succesorii din secolul al XX-lea

[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84947_a_85732]