21,673 matches
-
World: A Case Study", în: Marjolijn Verspoor, Kee Dong Lee, Eve Sweetser (eds.), Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning, Amsterdam - Philadelphia, Benjamins, p. 363-382. Levin, Beth Carol, 1983, On the Nature of Ergativity, Teză de doctorat, Cambridge, MIT. Levin, Beth, 1987, "The Middle Construction and Ergativity", Lingua, 71, p. 17-31. Levin, Beth, Malka Rappaport Hovav, 1995, Unaccusativity. At the Syntax −Lexical Semantics Interface, Cambridge−London, Cambridge University Press. Levin, Beth, Malka Rappaport Hovav, 2006 [2005], Argument Realization, [Cambridge
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
167. Pană Dindelegan, Gabriela, 2008f [2005f], "Predicatul", în GALR, II, p. 241−266/238−262. Pană Dindelegan, Gabriela, 2008g [2005g], "Numele predicativ", în GALR, II, p. 267−300/263−289. Pesetsky, David, 1995, Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades, Cambridge - Londra, MIT Press. Petcu, Roxana-Cristina, 2009, Ergativity in English and Romance, București, Editura Universității din București. Phillips, Colin, 1996, "Ergative Subjects", în: C. Burgess, K. Dziwirek, D. Gerdts (eds.), Grammatical Relations: Theoretical Approaches in Empirical Questions, Stanford, CSLI. Picabia, Lélia, 1998, "Accord
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
pragmatici); acesta trebuie deci să se combine cu alte caracteristici ergative. 17 J. H. Greenberg, "Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements", în: J. H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language, Cambridge, Massachusets, London, England, MIT Press, p. 73−113. 18 În acest fel, Dixon stabilește corespondența Abs.−Nom. și Erg.− Ac., asupra căreia s-au formulat numeroase ipoteze − vezi Capitolul 2, 3.2. 19 Dixon (1994: 63) discută situația unor limbi în care nominativul este
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
in English", Journal of Linguistics, 4, p. 1−32. 46 S. J. Keyser, T. Roeper, "On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 15, p. 81−416. 47 L. Burzio, Intransitive verbs and Italian auxiliaries, teză de doctorat, MIT. 48 L. Burzio, Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach, Dordrecht, D. Reidel. 49 D. Pesetsky, Paths and Categories, teză de doctorat, MIT. 50 Dixon (1987: 2) atrage atenția asupra faptului că, la începutul anilor '70, termenul nominativ era folosit și pentru
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 15, p. 81−416. 47 L. Burzio, Intransitive verbs and Italian auxiliaries, teză de doctorat, MIT. 48 L. Burzio, Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach, Dordrecht, D. Reidel. 49 D. Pesetsky, Paths and Categories, teză de doctorat, MIT. 50 Dixon (1987: 2) atrage atenția asupra faptului că, la începutul anilor '70, termenul nominativ era folosit și pentru a denumi marcarea argumentelor S și O din sistemele ergative (confuzie cu sensul tradițional al termenului ergativ). 51 Comrie (1989: 125
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
Li (ed.), Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Austin, University of Texas Press, p. 317−363. 1 M. Halle, A. Marantz, "Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection", în: K. Hale, S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building, 20, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, p. 111−176. 2 M. Halle, A. Marantz, "Some Key Features of Distributed Morphology", în: A. Carnie, H. Harley, T. Bures (eds.), Papers on Phonology and Morphology, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 21, p. 275−288. 3 P. Kiparsky
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building, 20, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, p. 111−176. 2 M. Halle, A. Marantz, "Some Key Features of Distributed Morphology", în: A. Carnie, H. Harley, T. Bures (eds.), Papers on Phonology and Morphology, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 21, p. 275−288. 3 P. Kiparsky, "Morphology and Grammatical Relations", ms., Stanford University. 4 J. Payne, "The Decay of Ergativity in Pamir Languages", Lingua, 51, 147−186. 5 L. Nash, Portée argumentale et marquage casuel
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
179−234, apud Roberts (2007: 307). 7 N. Chomsky, Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht, Foris. 8 N. Chomsky, Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use, New York, Praeger. 9 A. Marantz, On the Nature of Grammatical Relations, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, apud Larsen (1987: 34−35), Dixon (1987: 7−8), Levin (1987: 18, 23, 28), Nash (1998a). 10 J. Levin, D. Massam, "Surface Ergativity: Case/Theta Relations Re-Examined", Proceedings of NELS, 15, p. 86−301, apud Van de Visser (2006
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
28), Nash (1998a). 10 J. Levin, D. Massam, "Surface Ergativity: Case/Theta Relations Re-Examined", Proceedings of NELS, 15, p. 86−301, apud Van de Visser (2006: 53−54). 11 D. Massam, Case Theory and the Projection Principle, teză de doctorat, MIT. 12 A. Marantz, "Case and Licensing", comunicare prezentată la ESCOL, New Jersey. 13 K. G. Murasugi, Crossing and Nested Paths: NP Movement in Accusative and Ergative Languages, disertație, MIT, Cambridge, apud Van de Visser (2006: 56−57). 14 N. Chomsky
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
D. Massam, Case Theory and the Projection Principle, teză de doctorat, MIT. 12 A. Marantz, "Case and Licensing", comunicare prezentată la ESCOL, New Jersey. 13 K. G. Murasugi, Crossing and Nested Paths: NP Movement in Accusative and Ergative Languages, disertație, MIT, Cambridge, apud Van de Visser (2006: 56−57). 14 N. Chomsky, H. Lasnik, "The Theory of Principles and Parameters", în: J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, T. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Berlin, Mouton de
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, T. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, p. 506−569. Republicat în Chomsky (1995). 15 E. Jelinek, "Ergative Splits and Argument Type", în: J. Bobaljik, C. Phillips (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 18, Papers on Case and Agreement, p. 15−42, apud Nash (1997: 135−136). 16 E. A. Moravcik, "On the Distribution of Ergative and Accusative Patterns", Lingua, 45, p. 233−279, apud Müler (1995: 262, nota 8
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
Patterns", Lingua, 45, p. 233−279, apud Müler (1995: 262, nota 8). 17 J. Williamson, "Patient Marking in Lakota and the Unaccusative Hypothesis", Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 15, p. 353−365. 18 I. Laka, "Unergatives that Assign Ergative", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 18, p. 149−172. 19 Alexiadou (2001: 167) remarcă corespondențele foarte diferite stabilite între ergativ și alte structuri: grupul cu by 'de (către)' (Hale 1970 − K. Hale, "The Passive and Ergative in Language Change: The Australian
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
în: R. Jakobson (ed.), [1971], Selected Writings, vol. 2: Word and Language, The Hague, Mouton, p. 23−71. 23 A. D. Andrews, "The Representation of Case in Modern Icelandic", în: J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Cambridge, Massachusets, MIT Press, p. 427−503. 24 N. Chomsky, "Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework", în: R. Martin, D. Michaels, J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 89−155. 25 N. Chomsky
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Cambridge, Massachusets, MIT Press, p. 427−503. 24 N. Chomsky, "Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework", în: R. Martin, D. Michaels, J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 89−155. 25 N. Chomsky, "Derivation by Phase", în: M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale − A Life in Language, Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 1−52. 26 N. Chomsky, "Beyond Explanatory Adequacy", în: A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond, The
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
D. Michaels, J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 89−155. 25 N. Chomsky, "Derivation by Phase", în: M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale − A Life in Language, Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 1−52. 26 N. Chomsky, "Beyond Explanatory Adequacy", în: A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond, The Cartography of Syntactic Structure, vol 3. Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 104−131. 27 E. Woolford, "Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
Nominative, Objective and Accusative", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15, p. 181−227. 30 M. Butt, The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu, Stanford, CSLI. 31 A. K. Mahajan, The A/A-Bar Distinction and Movement Theory, teză de doctorat, MIT. 32 D. Massam. "Fully Internal Cases: Surface Ergativity Can Be Profound", în: A. Rachowski, N. Richards (eds.), Proceedings of AFLA VIII, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 44, p. 185−196. 33 T. Mohanan, Argument Structure in Hindi, Stanford, CSLI. 34
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
Urdu, Stanford, CSLI. 31 A. K. Mahajan, The A/A-Bar Distinction and Movement Theory, teză de doctorat, MIT. 32 D. Massam. "Fully Internal Cases: Surface Ergativity Can Be Profound", în: A. Rachowski, N. Richards (eds.), Proceedings of AFLA VIII, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 44, p. 185−196. 33 T. Mohanan, Argument Structure in Hindi, Stanford, CSLI. 34 H. Ura, Checking Theory and Grammatical Functions in Universal Grammar, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 35 L. Nash, "The Internal Ergative Subject Hypothesis
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
eds.), Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, vol. I: General Papers, Amsterdam, Jonh Benjamins, p. 177− 208. 41 I. Laka, "Unergatives that Assingn Ergative, Unaccusatives that Assign Accusative", în: J. D. Bobaljik, C. Phillips (eds.), Papers on Case and Agreement, 1, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 18, p. 149−172. 42 C. Phillips, "Conditions on Agreement in Yimas", în: J. D. Bobaljik, C. Phillips (eds.), Papers on Case and Agreement, 1, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 18, p. 173−213. 43 G.
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
Bobaljik, C. Phillips (eds.), Papers on Case and Agreement, 1, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 18, p. 149−172. 42 C. Phillips, "Conditions on Agreement in Yimas", în: J. D. Bobaljik, C. Phillips (eds.), Papers on Case and Agreement, 1, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 18, p. 173−213. 43 G. Cinque, Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Crosslinguistic Perspective, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 44 P. Hallman, "NP Interpretation and the Structure of Predicates", Language, 80, 4, p. 707−747. 45 Această
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
183−186, apud Lazard (1998: 57). 65 C. Collins, A Smuggling Approach to the Passive in English, Ms., Cornell University. 66 Ideea este reluată în Alexiadou (2001: 18). 67 Harley (1995) − Heidi Harley, Subjects, Events and Licensing, teză de doctorat, MIT −, apud Alexiadou (2001: 173), a formulat Parametrul Cazului mecanic: (a) dacă o trăsătură de Caz este verificată structural într-o propoziție, atunci aceasta este realizată ca Nom./Abs. (Caz obligatoriu); (b) dacă două trăsături de Caz sunt verificate structural într-
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
Perlmutter, P. M. Postal, "The 1 - Advancement Exclusiveness in Law", în: D. M. Perlmutter, C. G. Rosen (eds.), Relational Grammar, Chicago, Chicago University Press, 2, p. 81−128. 4 B. Hall (Partee), Subject and Object in Modern English, teză de doctorat, MIT. Vezi Legendre și Sorace (2003: 185). 5 Dacă se acceptă ideea că verbele de mișcare sunt inacuzative numai dacă denotă o mișcare direcționată, verbul a flutura nu aparține acestei clase. În plus, participiul adjectival fluturat are întotdeauna citire pasivă, deci
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
emisie de lumină și de căldură (Lumina sfântă se aprinde la Ierusalim). 35 Ca verb de emisie de lumină și de sunet (Norii se descarcă). 36 L. Levin, Operations on Lexical Forms: Unaccusative Rules in Germanic Languages, teză de doctorat, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. 37 M. Baker, J. Johnson, I. Roberts, "Passive Arguments Raised", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, p. 219−251. 38 R. Larson, "On the Double Object Construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, p. 335−391. 39 M. Krifka, "Manner in Dative Alternation", în
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, p. 201−225. 45 M. Arad, "On the Nature of v: Evidence from Object Experiencer Verbs", comunicare la Colocviul GLOW 22, Berlin. 46 K. Hale, S. Keyser, Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press. 47 Liina Pylkkänen, Introducing Arguments, teză de doctorat, MIT. 48 Categoria Tr este preluată de la C. Collins, 1997, Local Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press și adaptată. 49 C. Fillmore, "The Case for Case", în: E. Bach, R. T. Harms
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
On the Nature of v: Evidence from Object Experiencer Verbs", comunicare la Colocviul GLOW 22, Berlin. 46 K. Hale, S. Keyser, Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press. 47 Liina Pylkkänen, Introducing Arguments, teză de doctorat, MIT. 48 Categoria Tr este preluată de la C. Collins, 1997, Local Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press și adaptată. 49 C. Fillmore, "The Case for Case", în: E. Bach, R. T. Harms, editors, Universals in Linguistic Theory, New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]
-
au utilizat lat. agens cu referire la subiect (nominativ), iar lat. patiens, cu referire la obiect (acuzativ); distincția derivă din vechea opoziție stabilită de greci între "activitate" și "pasivitate". 51 J. S. Gruber, Studies in Lexical Relations, teză de doctorat, MIT, Cambridge, MA. 52 La Fillmore Obiectivul apare și sub numele de Ergativ (Pană Dindelegan 1972a: 56, nota 1). 53 R. S. Jackendoff, Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. 54 R. S. Jackendoff, Semantic Structures, Cambridge, MA, MIT
[Corola-publishinghouse/Science/84999_a_85785]